Strizki; James
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Strizki; James.The latest application filed is for "air-tight and water-tight electrical bonding device".
- Strizki; James - New Hope PA US
- Strizki; James - Hopewell NJ
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Air-tight and water-tight electrical bonding device Grant 9,667,012 - Strizki , et al. May 30, 2 | 2017-05-30 |
| Air-tight and water-tight electrical bonding device Grant 9,667,013 - Strizki , et al. May 30, 2 | 2017-05-30 |
| Air-Tight and Water-Tight Electrical Bonding Device App 20150180188 - Strizki; Michael ; et al. | 2015-06-25 |
| Air-Tight and Water-Tight Electrical Bonding Device App 20150180189 - Strizki; Michael ; et al. | 2015-06-25 |
| Air-tight and water-tight electrical bonding device Grant 8,997,336 - Strizki , et al. April 7, 2 | 2015-04-07 |
| Bonding fastener with environmental seals Grant 8,777,538 - Strizki , et al. July 15, 2 | 2014-07-15 |
| Air-Tight and Water-Tight Electrical Bonding Device App 20140068930 - Strizki; Michael ; et al. | 2014-03-13 |
| Bonding Fastener with Environmental Seals App 20140072387 - Strizki; Michael ; et al. | 2014-03-13 |
| SEC | 0001709333 | Strizki James |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 