Trademark applications and grants for Lenox Maclaren Surgical Corporation. Lenox Maclaren Surgical Corporation has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "WALLIE-HEINIG"
State Incorporated | COLORADO |
Entity Type | CORPORATION |
Address | 657 S. TAYLOR AVENUE SUITE A LOUISVILLE, COLORADO UNITED STATES 80027 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Dynamic Surgical Implant 20150230925 - 14/700219 Strippgen; Walter E. | 2015-08-20 |
DYNAMIC SURGICAL IMPLANT 20140058511 - 14/071189 Strippgen; Walter E. | 2014-02-27 |
Dynamic Surgical Implant 20120283839 - 13/551691 Strippgen; Walter E. | 2012-11-08 |
Dynamic surgical implant 9,393,120 - 14/700,219 Strippgen July 19, 2 | 2016-07-19 |
Dynamic surgical implant 9,393,120 - 14/700,219 Strippgen July 19, 2 | 2016-07-19 |
Dynamic surgical implant 9,023,085 - 14/071,189 Strippgen May 5, 2 | 2015-05-05 |
Dynamic surgical implant 9,023,085 - 14/071,189 Strippgen May 5, 2 | 2015-05-05 |
Dynamic surgical implant 8,608,784 - 13/551,691 Strippgen December 17, 2 | 2013-12-17 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
"WALLIE-HEINIG" 2614638 76230494 |
WALLIE-HEINIG 2001-03-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.