Stocker; Rudolf
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Stocker; Rudolf.The latest application filed is for "ionization vacuum measuring cell".
- Stocker; Rudolf - Wattwil CH
- Stocker; Rudolf - Azmoos CH
- Stocker; Rudolf - Uster CH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Ionization vacuum measuring cell Grant 9,945,749 - Andreaus , et al. April 17, 2 | 2018-04-17 |
| Ionization Vacuum Measuring Cell App 20160025587 - ANDREAUS; Bernhard ; et al. | 2016-01-28 |
| Combination pressure sensor with capacitive and thermal elements Grant 6,619,131 - Walchli , et al. September 16, 2 | 2003-09-16 |
| Combination pressure sensor with capactive and thermal elements App 20020129657 - Walchli, Urs ; et al. | 2002-09-19 |
| Process for evaluating the output signals of two pressure sensors and a pressure measuring arrangement with two pressure measuring sensors and a pressure measuring head Grant 5,583,297 - Stocker , et al. December 10, 1 | 1996-12-10 |
| Electrical scale with improved immunity to environmental disturbances Grant 4,212,361 - Stocker July 15, 1 | 1980-07-15 |
| Apparatus for correcting theodolites Grant 4,136,955 - Aeschlimann , et al. January 30, 1 | 1979-01-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 