Stitt; David T.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Stitt; David T..The latest application filed is for "device for monitoring cells".
- Stitt; David T. - Freeland MD
- Stitt; David T. - Parkton MD
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Luminescent method for determining cell oxygen consumption Grant 7,338,778 - Pitner , et al. March 4, 2 | 2008-03-04 |
| Device for monitoring cells App 20050191613 - Pitner, J. Bruce ; et al. | 2005-09-01 |
| Device for monitoring cells Grant 6,900,030 - Pitner , et al. May 31, 2 | 2005-05-31 |
| Device for monitoring cells App 20020155424 - Pitner, J. Bruce ; et al. | 2002-10-24 |
| Device for monitoring cells Grant 6,395,506 - Pitner , et al. May 28, 2 | 2002-05-28 |
| Enhanced detection of microorganisms in samples Grant 5,716,798 - Monthony , et al. February 10, 1 | 1998-02-10 |
| Microbial monitoring device Grant 5,567,598 - Stitt , et al. October 22, 1 | 1996-10-22 |
| Polyurethane biological sample collection and transport device and its use Grant 5,163,441 - Monthony , et al. * November 17, 1 | 1992-11-17 |
| Biological sample collection and transport device Grant 5,091,316 - Monthony , et al. February 25, 1 | 1992-02-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 