loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Stiefel; Joseph F..The latest application filed is for "golf ball having elongated dimples and method for making the same".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Golf ball having elongated dimples and method for making the same Grant 6,695,721 - Tavares , et al. February 24, 2 | 2004-02-24 |
Method for forming elongated dimples Grant 6,315,685 - Tavares , et al. November 13, 2 | 2001-11-13 |
Tetrahedral dimple pattern golf ball Grant 5,890,974 - Stiefel , et al. April 6, 1 | 1999-04-06 |
Golf ball Grant D406,623 - Stiefel March 9, 1 | 1999-03-09 |
Golf ball Grant D406,291 - Stiefel March 2, 1 | 1999-03-02 |
Golf ball dimple pattern Grant D377,816 - Stiefel , et al. February 4, 1 | 1997-02-04 |
Golf ball dimple pattern Grant D375,339 - Stiefel , et al. November 5, 1 | 1996-11-05 |
Golf Ball Grant 5,569,100 - Molitor , et al. October 29, 1 | 1996-10-29 |
Golf ball Grant 5,482,286 - Molitor , et al. * January 9, 1 | 1996-01-09 |
Golf ball Grant 5,273,287 - Molitor , et al. December 28, 1 | 1993-12-28 |
Golf ball Grant 5,018,741 - Stiefel , et al. May 28, 1 | 1991-05-28 |
Golf ball Grant 5,009,427 - Stiefel , et al. April 23, 1 | 1991-04-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.