loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Stephens; Gary Boyd.The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for sms termination overload protection".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Method and apparatus for SMS termination overload protection Grant 8,743,689 - Stephens June 3, 2 | 2014-06-03 |
Method And Apparatus For Sms Termination Overload Protection App 20110292808 - Stephens; Gary Boyd | 2011-12-01 |
Method of and system for delivering wireless calls Grant 6,600,920 - Stephens , et al. July 29, 2 | 2003-07-29 |
Method of and system for dynamically registering and paging mobile units in a wireless system Grant 6,393,285 - Stephens May 21, 2 | 2002-05-21 |
Method and system in a wireless communications network for providing restricted user termination areas based on originator location Grant 6,256,503 - Stephens July 3, 2 | 2001-07-03 |
System and method for reporting the location of a mobile telecommunications unit to an authorized terminator telecommunications unit Grant 6,151,505 - Larkins , et al. November 21, 2 | 2000-11-21 |
System and method for providing a geographic location of a mobile telecommunications unit Grant 6,091,957 - Larkins , et al. July 18, 2 | 2000-07-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.