Steiger; Dianne L.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Steiger; Dianne L..The latest application filed is for "automatic speech recognition to control integrated communication devices".
- Steiger; Dianne L. - Irvine CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and system for distribution of session scheduling Grant 7,242,687 - Honary , et al. July 10, 2 | 2007-07-10 |
| Weighted and prioritized task scheduler Grant 7,155,716 - Hooman , et al. December 26, 2 | 2006-12-26 |
| Automatic speech recognition to control integrated communication devices App 20050149337 - Asadi, Ayman O. ; et al. | 2005-07-07 |
| Method and system for distribution of session scheduling App 20030219020 - Honary, Hooman ; et al. | 2003-11-27 |
| Weighted and prioritized task scheduler App 20030172104 - Hooman, Honary ; et al. | 2003-09-11 |
| Speaker dependent speech recognition training using simplified hidden markov modeling and robust end-point detection Grant 6,405,168 - Bayya , et al. June 11, 2 | 2002-06-11 |
| Automatic load distribution for multiple digital signal processing system App 20020040381 - Steiger, Dianne L. ; et al. | 2002-04-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 