St. Onge; Gary F.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for St. Onge; Gary F..The latest application filed is for "loaded printed circuit board test fixture and method for manufacturing the same".
- St. Onge; Gary F. - Ballston Lake NY US
- St. Onge; Gary F. - Amsterdam NY
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Loaded printed circuit board test fixture and method for manufacturing the same Grant 8,648,616 - St. Onge , et al. February 11, 2 | 2014-02-11 |
| Loaded Printed Circuit Board Test Fixture And Method For Manufacturing The Same App 20110148448 - St. Onge; Gary F. ; et al. | 2011-06-23 |
| Floating spring probe wireless test fixture Grant 6,066,957 - Van Loan , et al. May 23, 2 | 2000-05-23 |
| Floating spring probe wireless test fixture Grant 6,025,729 - Van Loan , et al. February 15, 2 | 2000-02-15 |
| Loaded board test fixture with integral translator fixture for testing closely spaced test sites Grant 5,818,248 - St. Onge October 6, 1 | 1998-10-06 |
| Dual level test fixture Grant 5,214,374 - St. Onge May 25, 1 | 1993-05-25 |
| Technique for elimination of static in printed circuit board test fixtures Grant 4,814,698 - St. Onge , et al. March 21, 1 | 1989-03-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 