St. Croix; Bradley
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for St. Croix; Bradley.The latest application filed is for "anti-cd276 polypeptides, proteins, and chimeric antigen receptors".
- St. Croix; Bradley - Frederick MD
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Anti-cd276 Polypeptides, Proteins, And Chimeric Antigen Receptors App 20200255534 - Kind Code | 2020-08-13 |
| Anti-cd276 Antibodies (b7h3) App 20200199246 - Dimitrov; Dimiter S. ; et al. | 2020-06-25 |
| Anti-CD276 antibodies (B7H3) Grant 10,604,582 - Dimitrov , et al. | 2020-03-31 |
| Anti-CD276 polypeptides, proteins, and chimeric antigen receptors Grant 10,604,583 - Orentas , et al. | 2020-03-31 |
| Anti-cd276 Antibodies (b7h3) App 20180186890 - Dimitrov; Dimiter S. ; et al. | 2018-07-05 |
| Anti-cd276 Polypeptides, Proteins, And Chimeric Antigen Receptors App 20170369585 - Orentas; Rimas J. ; et al. | 2017-12-28 |
| Anti-CD276 polypeptides, proteins, and chimeric antigen receptors Grant 9,790,282 - Orentas , et al. October 17, 2 | 2017-10-17 |
| Anti-cd276 Polypeptides, Proteins, And Chimeric Antigen Receptors App 20160053017 - Orentas; Rimas J ; et al. | 2016-02-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 