Spooner; Gregory John Roy
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Spooner; Gregory John Roy.The latest application filed is for "laser apparatus and method for refractive surgery".
- Spooner; Gregory John Roy - San Francisco CA
- Spooner; Gregory John Roy - Ann Arbor MI
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Laser Apparatus And Method For Refractive Surgery App 20190321227 - Spooner; Gregory John Roy | 2019-10-24 |
| Laser apparatus and method for refractive surgery Grant 9,408,748 - Spooner August 9, 2 | 2016-08-09 |
| Laser Apparatus And Method For Refractive Surgery App 20160074225 - Spooner; Gregory John Roy | 2016-03-17 |
| Laser Apparatus And Method For Refractive Surgery App 20160074226 - Spooner; Gregory John Roy | 2016-03-17 |
| Laser apparatus and method for refractive surgery Grant 9,233,025 - Spooner January 12, 2 | 2016-01-12 |
| Laser Apparatus And Method For Refractive Surgery App 20120078240 - Spooner; Gregory John Roy | 2012-03-29 |
| Photodisruptive laser nucleation and ultrasonically-driven cavitation of tissues and materials Grant 6,391,020 - Kurtz , et al. May 21, 2 | 2002-05-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 