loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Spektor; Michael B..The latest application filed is for "optimized soil penetrating machine".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Optimized soil penetrating machine Grant 9,441,419 - Spektor September 13, 2 | 2016-09-13 |
Optimized Soil Penetrating Machine App 20160040481 - Spektor; Michael B. | 2016-02-11 |
Optimized Pneumatic Hammer App 20150273676 - Spektor; Michael B. | 2015-10-01 |
Reversible penetrating machine with a differential air distributing mechanism Grant 7,273,113 - Spektor September 25, 2 | 2007-09-25 |
Reversible penetrating machine with a springless pneumatically loaded differential air distributing mechanism App 20060207794 - Spektor; Michael B. | 2006-09-21 |
Monotube differential pneumopercussive reversible self-propelled soil penetrating machine with stabilizers Grant 5,467,831 - Spektor November 21, 1 | 1995-11-21 |
Differential pneumopercussive reversible self-propelled soil penetrating machine Grant 5,311,950 - Spektor May 17, 1 | 1994-05-17 |
Pneumopercussive machine Grant 5,226,487 - Spektor * July 13, 1 | 1993-07-13 |
Pneumopercussive soil penetrating machine Grant 5,031,706 - Spektor July 16, 1 | 1991-07-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.