loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Sparks; Charles.The latest application filed is for "tube comprising composite layers with different modulii of elasticity".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Tube comprising composite layers with different modulii of elasticity Grant 5,499,661 - Odru , et al. March 19, 1 | 1996-03-19 |
Process for manufacturing a variable stiffness line and associated element Grant 5,447,390 - Sparks , et al. September 5, 1 | 1995-09-05 |
Method for mechanical joining a tube of composite material and a metallic fitting and structure thus obtained Grant 5,288,109 - Auberon , et al. February 22, 1 | 1994-02-22 |
Composition material tube substantially insensitive to the variations of length under the effect of the internal pressure Grant 5,110,644 - Sparks , et al. May 5, 1 | 1992-05-05 |
Method for affixing a metallic tip to a tube made of composite wound material Grant 5,062,914 - Fuchs , et al. November 5, 1 | 1991-11-05 |
Variable rigidity element for transfer column foot Grant 4,854,781 - Sparks , et al. August 8, 1 | 1989-08-08 |
Marine riser provided with a hinged foot for offshore hydrocarbon production Grant 4,362,215 - Sparks December 7, 1 | 1982-12-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.