Soyka; Stephan
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Soyka; Stephan.The latest application filed is for "process for reducing the acrylamide content of heat-treated foods".
- Soyka; Stephan - Berlin DE
- Soyka; Stephan - Sint-Denijs-Western BE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Phosphorylated waxy potato starch Grant 8,148,517 - Soyka , et al. April 3, 2 | 2012-04-03 |
| Process For Reducing The Acrylamide Content Of Heat-treated Foods App 20120009307 - Soyka; Stephan ; et al. | 2012-01-12 |
| Plants that produce amylopectin starch with novel properties Grant 8,067,670 - Landschuetze , et al. November 29, 2 | 2011-11-29 |
| High-phosphate starch Grant 7,989,616 - Soyka , et al. August 2, 2 | 2011-08-02 |
| High-phosphate Starch App 20090270605 - Soyka; Stephan ; et al. | 2009-10-29 |
| Phosphorylated Waxy Potato Starch App 20090105469 - Soyka; Stephan ; et al. | 2009-04-23 |
| Plants that Produce Amylopectin Starch With Novel Properties App 20080251225 - Landschuetze; Volker ; et al. | 2008-10-16 |
| Process for reducing the acrylamide content of heat-treated foods App 20060233930 - Soyka; Stephan ; et al. | 2006-10-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 