loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Song; Jae Seop.The latest application filed is for "portable optical-fiber processing equipment".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Optical fiber fusion splicer Grant 8,596,887 - Song , et al. December 3, 2 | 2013-12-03 |
Portable optical-fiber processing equipment Grant 8,509,587 - Song , et al. August 13, 2 | 2013-08-13 |
Portable Optical-fiber Processing Equipment App 20120174714 - SONG; JAE SEOP ;   et al. | 2012-07-12 |
Optical fiber fusion splicer Grant D652,850 - Song , et al. January 24, 2 | 2012-01-24 |
Portable optical-fiber processing equipment Grant 8,092,100 - Song , et al. January 10, 2 | 2012-01-10 |
Optical Fiber Fusion Splicer App 20100272405 - Song; Jae Seop ;   et al. | 2010-10-28 |
Optical Fiber Cleaver App 20100163593 - Song; Jae Seop ;   et al. | 2010-07-01 |
Portable Opitcal-Fiber Processing Equipment App 20080282522 - Song; Jae Seop ;   et al. | 2008-11-20 |
Optical fiber treatment apparatus App 20070172191 - Song; Jae Seop | 2007-07-26 |
Automatic optical-fiber cutter Grant 7,070,078 - Song July 4, 2 | 2006-07-04 |
Automatic optical-fiber cutter App 20050169594 - Song, Jae Seop | 2005-08-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.