Trademark applications and grants for Societe Industrielle De Liaisons Electriques. Societe Industrielle De Liaisons Electriques has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "SIPRELEC"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Cable having fine conductors, in particular optical fibers, and a method and apparatus for making a cable having fine conductors 5,671,312 - 08/569,091 Jamet September 23, 1 | 1997-09-23 |
Reserve device for optical fibers 4,802,724 - 07/074,304 Fraize , et al. February 7, 1 | 1989-02-07 |
Device for dispensing optical fibers into helical grooves of a ring 4,635,430 - 06/739,062 Missout , et al. January 13, 1 | 1987-01-13 |
System for rotationally slaving an optical fiber feeding and dispensing device in a cabling line 4,587,801 - 06/739,060 Missout , et al. May 13, 1 | 1986-05-13 |
Device for arraying the ends of optical fibers spaced out around an axially symmetrical structure 4,529,266 - 06/436,416 Delebecque July 16, 1 | 1985-07-16 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "SIPRELEC" 1821154 74396574 |
SIPRELEC 1993-06-01 |
![]() "SILYTHENE" 1947171 74379057 |
SILYTHENE 1993-04-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.