Snape; Evan William
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Snape; Evan William.The latest application filed is for "process for isolating mono-carboxy substituted probucol derivatives".
- Snape; Evan William - Bristol GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Chemical process Grant 8,034,932 - Butters , et al. October 11, 2 | 2011-10-11 |
| Process For Isolating Mono-Carboxy Substituted Probucol Derivatives App 20100324328 - Parker; Jeremy Stephen ; et al. | 2010-12-23 |
| Chemical Process Grant 7,803,586 - Brown , et al. September 28, 2 | 2010-09-28 |
| Processes For The Manufacture Of Rosuvastatin And Intermediates App 20100228028 - Butters; Michael ; et al. | 2010-09-09 |
| Chemical Process App 20080207903 - Butters; Michael ; et al. | 2008-08-28 |
| Chemical Process App 20080115247 - Brown; David ; et al. | 2008-05-15 |
| Amine Salts Of (-)-2-((2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Ethyl)Thio)-3-(4-(2-(4-((Methylsulfonyl)Oxy)Ph- enoxy)Ethyl)Phenyl) Propanoic Acid App 20080090905 - Snape; Evan William | 2008-04-17 |
| Crystalline dibenzothiazepine derivative and its use as an antipsychotic agent App 20020147186 - Snape, Evan William | 2002-10-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 