Smith; Scott O.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Smith; Scott O..The latest application filed is for "cuff-blade attachment bushing removal".
- Smith; Scott O. - Bedford TX
- Smith; Scott O. - Seattle WA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Cuff-blade attachment bushing removal Grant 10,518,395 - Smith , et al. Dec | 2019-12-31 |
| Weights for water immersion testing Grant 10,457,422 - Littlejohn , et al. Oc | 2019-10-29 |
| Cuff-blade Attachment Bushing Removal App 20190143497 - Smith; Scott O. ; et al. | 2019-05-16 |
| Cuff-blade attachment bushing removal Grant 10,183,388 - Smith , et al. Ja | 2019-01-22 |
| Weights For Water Immersion Testing App 20180155062 - Littlejohn; David W. ; et al. | 2018-06-07 |
| Cuff-blade Attachment Bushing Removal App 20180029210 - Smith; Scott O. ; et al. | 2018-02-01 |
| Apparatus and method for accurate countersinking and rivet shaving for mechanical assembly operations Grant 6,550,118 - Smith , et al. April 22, 2 | 2003-04-22 |
| Apparatus and method for accurate countersinking and rivet shaving for mechanical assembly operations App 20020104207 - Smith, Scott O. ; et al. | 2002-08-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 