Smith; Charles Satish
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Smith; Charles Satish.The latest application filed is for "systems and methods for anaerobic digestion of biomaterials".
- Smith; Charles Satish - West Chester PA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Systems and methods for anaerobic digestion of biomaterials Grant 9,815,721 - Smith November 14, 2 | 2017-11-14 |
| Systems And Methods For Anaerobic Digestion Of Biomaterials App 20140263040 - Smith; Charles Satish | 2014-09-18 |
| Systems and methods for anaerobic digestion of biomaterials Grant 8,758,615 - Smith June 24, 2 | 2014-06-24 |
| Systems And Methods For Anaerobic Digestion Of Biomaterials App 20130193067 - Smith; Charles Satish | 2013-08-01 |
| Systems and methods for anaerobic digestion of biomaterials Grant 8,414,770 - Smith April 9, 2 | 2013-04-09 |
| Systems and methods for anaerobic digestion of biomaterials Grant 8,308,946 - Smith November 13, 2 | 2012-11-13 |
| Systems And Methods For Anaerobic Digestion Of Biomaterials App 20120132586 - Smith; Charles Satish | 2012-05-31 |
| Systems And Methods For Anaerobic Digestion Of Biomaterials App 20120125840 - Smith; Charles Satish | 2012-05-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 