Trademark applications and grants for Smarthealth, Inc.. Smarthealth, Inc. has 92 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ECOSOLUTION"
State Incorporated | ARIZONA |
Entity Type | CORPORATION |
Address | 3400 East McDowell Phoenix, ARIZONA UNITED STATES 85008 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
DIGITAL PRINTING ON PAPER BAGS FOR LOW VOLUME APPLICATIONS 20210197556 - 16/729843 Klenk; Karl-Michael ;   et al. | 2021-07-01 |
PRECISION DISPENSING DEVICE OF SMALL VOLUME FROM PRE-FILLED SYRINGES 20150136809 - 14/086005 Hamann; Curtis P. ;   et al. | 2015-05-21 |
Polylactide Hydrosol and Articles Made Therefrom 20140031436 - 14/037610 Hamann; Curtis P. ;   et al. | 2014-01-30 |
Dispensing Device for Prefilled Syringe 20130245492 - 13/421109 Klenk; Karl-Michael ;   et al. | 2013-09-19 |
Polylactide Hydrosol and Articles Made Therefrom 20120309852 - 13/586215 Hamann; Curtis P. ;   et al. | 2012-12-06 |
NCAGE Code | 0VVB0 | SMARTHEALTH, INC.!DBA SMARTPRACTICE!DIV GOV'T/INSTITUTIONAL SALES DIV |
CAGE Code | 0VVB0 | SMARTHEALTH, INC. SMARTPRACTICE GOV'T/INSTITUTIONAL SALES DIV |
S.A.M. Registration | 0VVB0 [61081477] | SMARTHEALTH, INC. SMARTPRACTICE |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.