loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Slaker; Frank A..The latest application filed is for "sequence valve for piggyback iv administration with tube reversal prevention".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Sequence valve for piggyback IV administration with tube reversal prevention Grant 4,714,463 - Archibald , et al. December 22, 1 | 1987-12-22 |
Sequence valve for piggyback IV administration Grant 4,673,389 - Archibald , et al. June 16, 1 | 1987-06-16 |
Sequence valve for piggyback IV administration with occlusion failure sensing Grant 4,637,817 - Archibald , et al. January 20, 1 | 1987-01-20 |
Multiple source laser scanning inspection system Grant 4,265,545 - Slaker May 5, 1 | 1981-05-05 |
Method and apparatus for a web edge tracking flaw detection system Grant 4,247,204 - Merlen , et al. January 27, 1 | 1981-01-27 |
Method and apparatus for a rotary scanner flaw detection system Grant 3,980,891 - Slaker September 14, 1 | 1976-09-14 |
Laser scanner flaw detection system using baseline follower signal processing Grant 3,920,970 - Slaker November 18, 1 | 1975-11-18 |
Aerating Machine Grant 3,834,464 - Carlson , et al. September 10, 1 | 1974-09-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.