Skarphol; Jonathon C.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Skarphol; Jonathon C..The latest application filed is for "system and method for authentication and cryptographic ignition of remote devices".
- Skarphol; Jonathon C. - Robins IA
- Skarphol; Jonathon C. - Cedar Rapids IA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| System and Method for Authentication and Cryptographic Ignition of Remote Devices App 20220070008 - Howard; Sean ; et al. | 2022-03-03 |
| Time division multiple access (TDMA) and contention access waveform network Grant 10,999,876 - Chamberlain , et al. May 4, 2 | 2021-05-04 |
| Maintaining position relative to an air anomaly Grant 10,908,277 - Roggendorf , et al. February 2, 2 | 2021-02-02 |
| Modified time division multiple access (TDMA) network Grant 10,855,389 - Roggendorf , et al. December 1, 2 | 2020-12-01 |
| Information flow enforcement for multilevel secure systems Grant 10,757,111 - Marek , et al. A | 2020-08-25 |
| Method, Apparatus, System and Program Product Supporting Improved Access Latency for a Sectored Directory App 20080307169 - Averill; Duane Arlyn ; et al. | 2008-12-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 