Skalitzky; Donald James
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Skalitzky; Donald James.The latest application filed is for "novel phenicol antibacterials".
- Skalitzky; Donald James - Ann Arbor MI
- Skalitzky; Donald James - San Diego CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Novel Phenicol Antibacterials App 20150344412 - Duclos; Brian A. ; et al. | 2015-12-03 |
| Phenicol antibacterials Grant 9,145,355 - Duclos , et al. September 29, 2 | 2015-09-29 |
| Novel Phenicol Antibacterials App 20140303384 - Duclos; Brian A. ; et al. | 2014-10-09 |
| Antipicornaviral compounds and compositions, their pharmaceutical uses, and materials for their synthesis Grant 6,989,384 - Hua , et al. January 24, 2 | 2006-01-24 |
| Antipicornaviral compounds and compositions, their pharmaceutical uses, and materials for their synthesis Grant 6,632,825 - Johnson, Jr. , et al. October 14, 2 | 2003-10-14 |
| Tricyclic inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases Grant 6,548,494 - Webber , et al. April 15, 2 | 2003-04-15 |
| Antipicornaviral compounds and compositions, their pharmaceutical uses, and materials for their synthesis App 20020061916 - Johnson, Jr., Theodore O. ; et al. | 2002-05-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 