SIS AG, Surgical Instrument Systems

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for SIS AG, Surgical Instrument Systems.The latest application filed is for "ophthalmological measurement apparatus and measurement method".

Company Profile

0.12.11

SIS AG, Surgical Instrument Systems - CH CH
SIS AG, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS - PORT CH
SIS AG Surgical Instrument Systems - Brugg b. Biel CH
SIS AG, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS - Allmendstrasse11 CH 2562
SIS AG Surgical Instrument Systems - Brugg CH
SIS AG Surgical Instrument Systems - Portstrasse 35 Brugg CH
SIS AG Surgical Instrument Systems - Brugg b. CH

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.
Trademarks

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Device and method for measuring a cornea Grant 9,004,690 - Rathjen , et al. April 14, 2	2015-04-14
Ophthalmological measurement apparatus and measurement method Grant 8,727,532 - Rathjen May 20, 2	2014-05-20
Ophthalmological measuring device and measurement method Grant 8,480,231 - Rathjen July 9, 2	2013-07-09
Device and method for measuring a cornea Grant 8,414,124 - Rathjen , et al. April 9, 2	2013-04-09
Ophthalmological measuring apparatus Grant 8,136,945 - Rathjen March 20, 2	2012-03-20
Ophthalmological measuring device and measurement method Grant 8,025,401 - Rathjen September 27, 2	2011-09-27
Ophthalmological device and ophthalmological measuring method Grant 7,959,289 - Cattin-Liebl June 14, 2	2011-06-14
Ophthalmological Measurement Apparatus And Measurement Method App 20100014051 - Rathjen; Christian	2010-01-21
Ophthalmological Device And Ophthalmological Measuring Method App 20090303437 - Cattin-Liebl; Roger	2009-12-10
Ophthalmological measuring apparatus App 20090257025 - Rathjen; Christian	2009-10-15
Ophthalmological measuring device Grant 7,527,380 - Rathjen May 5, 2	2009-05-05
Device and method for determining geometric measurement values of an eye Grant 7,434,933 - Rathjen October 14, 2	2008-10-14
Ophthalmologic device and ophthalmologic measuring method Grant 7,264,355 - Rathjen September 4, 2	2007-09-04
Ophthalmological measuring device App 20070182927 - Rathjen; Christian	2007-08-09
Scalpel blade holder and scalpel Grant 7,150,754 - Ziemer December 19, 2	2006-12-19
Blade and blade carrier suitable therefor App 20060058822 - Rathjen; Christian ; et al.	2006-03-16
Device for detecting measurands in an eye App 20050231686 - Rathjen, Christian	2005-10-20
Scalpel blade holder and scalpel App 20050101978 - Ziemer, Frank	2005-05-12
Ophthalmologic device and ophthalmologic measuring method App 20040119943 - Rathjen, Christian	2004-06-24
Devices and methods for determining the inner pressure of an eye Grant 6,746,400 - Rathjen June 8, 2	2004-06-08
Device and method for determining geometric measurement values of an eye App 20030189689 - Rathjen, Christian	2003-10-09
Devices and methods for determining the inner pressure of an eye App 20020193675 - Rathjen, Christian	2002-12-19
Method and device configuration for determining the corneal thickness of an eye App 20020171804 - Rathjen, Christian	2002-11-21

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.