loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Silmy; Kamel.The latest application filed is for "radiation-selective absorber coating and absorber tube with said radiation-selective absorber coating".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Radiation-selective absorber coating and absorber tube with radiation-selective absorber coating Grant 10,774,426 - Kuckelkorn , et al. Sept | 2020-09-15 |
Radiation-selective absorber coating and absorber tube with said radiation-selective absorber coating Grant 8,555,871 - Kuckelkorn , et al. October 15, 2 | 2013-10-15 |
Radiation-selective absorber coating, absorber tube and process for production thereof Grant 8,318,329 - Silmy , et al. November 27, 2 | 2012-11-27 |
Radiation-selective absorber coating and absorber tube with said radiation-selective absorber coating App 20110088687 - Kuckelkorn; Thomas ;   et al. | 2011-04-21 |
Radiation-selective Absorber Coating And Absorber Tube With Radiation-selective Absorber Coating App 20100294263 - Kuckelkorn; Thomas ;   et al. | 2010-11-25 |
Radiation-selective Absorber Coating, Absober Tube And Process For Production Thereof App 20090208761 - SILMY; Kamel ;   et al. | 2009-08-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.