Shiba; Nobuyasu
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Shiba; Nobuyasu.The latest application filed is for "method of manufacturing wire wound electronic component".
- Shiba; Nobuyasu - Tokyo JP
- Shiba, Nobuyasu - Tano-Gun JP
- Shiba; Nobuyasu - Takasaki JP
- Shiba; Nobuyasu - Ueno JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method of manufacturing wire wound electronic component Grant 6,727,792 - Amada , et al. April 27, 2 | 2004-04-27 |
| Method of manufacturing wire wound electronic component App 20020190832 - Amada, Yoshihiro ; et al. | 2002-12-19 |
| Method of manufacturing wire wound electronic component Grant 6,449,830 - Amada , et al. September 17, 2 | 2002-09-17 |
| Common mode choke coil App 20020084878 - Kimura, Satoshi ; et al. | 2002-07-04 |
| Wire wound electronic component and method of manufacturing the same Grant 6,144,280 - Amada , et al. November 7, 2 | 2000-11-07 |
| Amorphous silicon solar battery Grant 4,675,469 - Iida , et al. June 23, 1 | 1987-06-23 |
| Amorphous semiconductor solar cell having a grained transparent electrode Grant 4,500,743 - Hayashi , et al. February 19, 1 | 1985-02-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 