loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for SHELL CANADA LIMITED.The latest application filed is for "tool for excavating an object".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Tool for excavating an object App 20060219443 - Blange; Jan-Jette | 2006-10-05 |
Paving binders and manufacturing methods App 20050051056 - Bailey, William R. ;   et al. | 2005-03-10 |
Sulfur additives for paving binders and manufacturing methods Grant 6,863,724 - Bailey , et al. March 8, 2 | 2005-03-08 |
Paving binders and manufacturing methods Grant 6,824,600 - Bailey , et al. November 30, 2 | 2004-11-30 |
Recovering hydrocarbons from tar sand or heavy oil reservoirs Grant 5,318,124 - Ong , et al. June 7, 1 | 1994-06-07 |
Process for recovery of bitumen from a bituminous froth Grant 4,035,282 - Stuchberry , et al. July 12, 1 | 1977-07-12 |
Producing Oil From Tar Sand Grant 3,847,219 - Wang , et al. November 12, 1 | 1974-11-12 |
NCAGE Code | 36131 | SHELL CANADA LTD |
CAGE Code | 36131 | SHELL CANADA LTD |
CAGE Code | L8851 | SHELL CANADA LIMITED SHELL CANADA PRODUCTS |
S.A.M. Registration | L8851 [243920605] | SHELL CANADA LIMITED |
SEC | 0000702983 | SHELL CANADA LTD of ONTARIO, CANADA |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.