Shaw; Steven M.

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Shaw; Steven M..The latest application filed is for "object-oriented transaction computing system".

Company Profile

0.17.0

Shaw; Steven M. - Leonia NJ
Shaw; Steven M. - Leonie NJ

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Object-oriented transaction computing system Grant 6,424,989 - Shaw , et al. July 23, 2	2002-07-23
System for producing a quantized signal Grant 6,404,928 - Shaw , et al. June 11, 2	2002-06-11
Method and apparatus including system architecture for multimedia communications Grant 6,356,945 - Shaw , et al. March 12, 2	2002-03-12
Information processing system for directing information request from a particular user/application, and searching/forwarding/retrieving information from unknown and large number of information resources Grant 6,349,297 - Shaw , et al. February 19, 2	2002-02-19
Server apparatus for distributed communications supporting multiple user/application environment Grant 6,233,590 - Shaw , et al. May 15, 2	2001-05-15
Digital dictionary with a communication system for the creating, updating, editing, storing, maintaining, referencing, and managing the digital dictionary Grant 6,151,598 - Shaw , et al. November 21, 2	2000-11-21
System for producing a quantized signal Grant 6,091,857 - Shaw , et al. July 18, 2	2000-07-18
Electronic transaction system for banking, security, and/or charge card Grant 6,069,968 - Shaw , et al. May 30, 2	2000-05-30
Single chip integrated circuit system architecture for document instruction set computing Grant 5,867,712 - Shaw , et al. February 2, 1	1999-02-02
System for estimating worst time duration required to execute procedure calls and looking ahead/preparing for the next stack operation of the forthcoming procedure calls Grant 5,832,289 - Shaw , et al. November 3, 1	1998-11-03
Document data processor for an object-oriented knowledge management system containing a personal database in communication with a packet processor Grant 5,806,068 - Shaw , et al. September 8, 1	1998-09-08
Integrated circuit system for direct document execution Grant 5,754,766 - Shaw , et al. May 19, 1	1998-05-19
System for regulating multicomputer data transfer by allocating time slot to designated processing task according to communication bandwidth capabilities and modifying time slots when bandwidth change Grant 5,745,758 - Shaw , et al. April 28, 1	1998-04-28
Method and apparatus including system architecture for multimedia communication Grant 5,706,290 - Shaw , et al. January 6, 1	1998-01-06
Audio/video transceiver provided with a device for reconfiguration of incompatibly received or transmitted video and audio information Grant 5,611,038 - Shaw , et al. March 11, 1	1997-03-11
Single chip integrated circuit system architecture for document installation set computing Grant 5,600,844 - Shaw , et al. February 4, 1	1997-02-04
System for producing a video-instruction set utilizing a real-time frame differential bit map and microblock subimages Grant 5,457,780 - Shaw , et al. October 10, 1	1995-10-10

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.