Shannon; Daryl R.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Shannon; Daryl R..The latest application filed is for "solving hybrid constraints to generate test cases for validating a software module".
- Shannon; Daryl R. - Houston TX US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Solving hybrid constraints to validate specification requirements of a software module Grant 8,572,574 - Ghosh , et al. October 29, 2 | 2013-10-29 |
| Solving Hybrid Constraints to Validate a Security Software Module for Detecting Injection Attacks App 20120017200 - Ghosh; Indradeep ; et al. | 2012-01-19 |
| Solving Hybrid Constraints to Validate Specification Requirements of a Software Module App 20120017117 - Ghosh; Indradeep ; et al. | 2012-01-19 |
| Solving Hybrid Constraints to Generate Test Cases for Validating a Software Module App 20120017119 - Ghosh; Indradeep ; et al. | 2012-01-19 |
| Efficient Symbolic Execution Of Software Using Static Analysis App 20100223599 - Ghosh; Indradeep ; et al. | 2010-09-02 |
| System and Method for Providing Symbolic Execution Engine for Validating Web Applications App 20090089759 - Rajan; Sreeranga P. ; et al. | 2009-04-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 