Shanghai Zhenhua Port Machinery Co., Ltd.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Shanghai Zhenhua Port Machinery Co., Ltd..The latest application filed is for "container lifter being able to lift two 40 feet containers".
- Shanghai Zhenhua Port Machinery Co., Ltd. - Shanghai CN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Container lifter being able to lift two 40 feet containers Grant 7,918,354 - Shan April 5, 2 | 2011-04-05 |
| Arrangement scheme of a container wharf and the container loading/unloading process Grant 7,686,558 - Tian , et al. March 30, 2 | 2010-03-30 |
| Lifting machinery of two reel differential type for two 40 feet container shore crane Grant 7,556,161 - Shan , et al. July 7, 2 | 2009-07-07 |
| Lifting machinery of four reel differential type for two 40 feet container shore crane Grant 7,494,020 - Shan , et al. February 24, 2 | 2009-02-24 |
| Twin lifting machinery for two 40 feet container shore crane Grant 7,461,832 - Zhang December 9, 2 | 2008-12-09 |
| NCAGE Code | SFY45 | SHANGHAI ZHENHUA PORT MACHINERY CO., LTD. |
| CAGE Code | SFY45 | SHANGHAI ZHENHUA PORT MACHINERY CO.,LTD. ZPMC |
| SEC | 0001445157 | Shanghai Zhenhua Port Machinery Co., Ltd. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 