Shafer; Philip Austin
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Shafer; Philip Austin.The latest application filed is for "processing numeric addresses in a network router".
- Shafer; Philip Austin - Raleigh NC
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Processing numeric addresses in a network router Grant 7,779,087 - Wilson , et al. August 17, 2 | 2010-08-17 |
| Processing configuration group information to display or generate configuration information, such as hierarchical configuration information for use by a data forwarding device Grant 7,421,485 - Shafer September 2, 2 | 2008-09-02 |
| Configuring a network router Grant 7,398,323 - Gerraty , et al. July 8, 2 | 2008-07-08 |
| Processing numeric addresses in a network router App 20070118621 - Wilson; Reid Evan ; et al. | 2007-05-24 |
| Processing numeric addresses in a network router Grant 7,171,457 - Wilson , et al. January 30, 2 | 2007-01-30 |
| Creating and applying configuration information App 20060259654 - Shafer; Philip Austin | 2006-11-16 |
| Applying configuration group information to target configuration information Grant 7,096,256 - Shafer August 22, 2 | 2006-08-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 