loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Seidler; David.The latest application filed is for "virtual hinge".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Virtual hinge Grant 7,467,440 - Seidler December 23, 2 | 2008-12-23 |
Magnetic hinge Grant 7,337,497 - Seidler , et al. March 4, 2 | 2008-03-04 |
Magnetic hinge and device including magnetically-attracted plates Grant 7,089,627 - Seidler August 15, 2 | 2006-08-15 |
Magnetic hinge Grant 7,055,216 - Seidler June 6, 2 | 2006-06-06 |
Virtual hinge App 20050268433 - Seidler, David | 2005-12-08 |
Magnetic hinge Grant 6,961,977 - Seidler November 8, 2 | 2005-11-08 |
Magnetic hinge App 20050210629 - Seidler, David ;   et al. | 2005-09-29 |
Multi-stable magnetic article Grant 6,831,541 - Seidler December 14, 2 | 2004-12-14 |
Device including a cover having limited opening movement App 20040244812 - Seidler, David ;   et al. | 2004-12-09 |
Magnetic hinge App 20040134030 - Seidler, David | 2004-07-15 |
Magnetic hinge App 20040134037 - Seidler, David | 2004-07-15 |
Magnetic hinge App 20030167599 - Seidler, David | 2003-09-11 |
Airtight magnetic applicator system Grant 6,588,958 - Seidler July 8, 2 | 2003-07-08 |
Virtual hinge App 20020153376 - Seidler, David | 2002-10-24 |
Combined package with candle Grant D429,148 - Seidler August 8, 2 | 2000-08-08 |
Combined package with candle Grant D424,932 - Seidler May 16, 2 | 2000-05-16 |
Combined package with candle Grant D424,430 - Seidler May 9, 2 | 2000-05-09 |
Liquid dosage dispensers Grant 6,045,003 - Seidler April 4, 2 | 2000-04-04 |
Package for candle with protective cover Grant 6,036,024 - Seidler March 14, 2 | 2000-03-14 |
Blister pack with built-in openers Grant 5,816,404 - Seidler October 6, 1 | 1998-10-06 |
Blister pack with built-in product ejection system Grant 5,673,793 - Seidler October 7, 1 | 1997-10-07 |
Pump dispenser with movable bottle Grant 5,487,489 - Weiss , et al. January 30, 1 | 1996-01-30 |
Pump dispenser with movable bottle Grant 5,377,869 - Weiss , et al. January 3, 1 | 1995-01-03 |
Cosmetic sampler applicator Grant 5,031,647 - Seidler July 16, 1 | 1991-07-16 |
Liquid applicator sampler tube Grant 4,990,016 - Seidler February 5, 1 | 1991-02-05 |
Compact case with irreversible hinge Grant 4,840,288 - Lunderman , et al. June 20, 1 | 1989-06-20 |
Compact case Grant 4,586,519 - Seidler , et al. May 6, 1 | 1986-05-06 |
Cosmetic compact with extendable applicator Grant 4,579,133 - Seidler April 1, 1 | 1986-04-01 |
Adjustable product applicator Grant 4,498,490 - Seidler February 12, 1 | 1985-02-12 |
Hinged lid container Grant 4,366,915 - Seidler January 4, 1 | 1983-01-04 |
Devices with two working surfaces Grant 4,184,499 - Seidler January 22, 1 | 1980-01-22 |
Parts pick up and manipulating devices Grant 4,073,530 - Seidler February 14, 1 | 1978-02-14 |
Dispensing device Grant 3,989,392 - Seidler November 2, 1 | 1976-11-02 |
Cosmetic Applicator Grant 3,825,021 - Seidler July 23, 1 | 1974-07-23 |
Cosmetic Applicator Grant 3,807,881 - Seidler April 30, 1 | 1974-04-30 |
Urine Testing Apparatus Grant 3,774,455 - Seidler , et al. November 27, 1 | 1973-11-27 |
Parts Holder Grant 3,645,281 - Seidler February 29, 1 | 1972-02-29 |
Eye Shadow Powder Dispenser Grant 3,630,211 - Seidler December 28, 1 | 1971-12-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.