Seawright; James Andrew Garrard
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Seawright; James Andrew Garrard.The latest application filed is for "clock model for formal verification of a digital circuit description".
- Seawright; James Andrew Garrard - Mountain View CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Clock model for formal verification of a digital circuit description Grant 8,060,847 - Seawright , et al. November 15, 2 | 2011-11-15 |
| Clock Model For Formal Verification Of A Digital Circuit Description App 20090144684 - Seawright; James Andrew Garrard ; et al. | 2009-06-04 |
| Clock model for formal verification of a digital circuit description Grant 7,487,483 - Seawright , et al. February 3, 2 | 2009-02-03 |
| Selection of initial states for formal verification Grant 7,454,324 - Seawright , et al. November 18, 2 | 2008-11-18 |
| Clock model for formal verification of a digital circuit description App 20070271536 - Seawright; James Andrew Garrard ; et al. | 2007-11-22 |
| Method And Apparatus For Optimized Partitioning Of Finite State Machines Synthesized From Hierarchical High-level Descriptions App 20020023256 - SEAWRIGHT, JAMES ANDREW GARRARD | 2002-02-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 