Searcy; James Fredrick
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Searcy; James Fredrick.The latest application filed is for "apparatus and method for detecting radar obstruction".
- Searcy; James Fredrick - Carmel IN
- Searcy; James Fredrick - Tucson AZ
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method of measuring elevational mis-alignment of an automotive radar sensor Grant 6,556,166 - Searcy , et al. April 29, 2 | 2003-04-29 |
| Apparatus And Method For Detecting Radar Obstruction App 20020163463 - Lajiness, Gregory George ; et al. | 2002-11-07 |
| Apparatus and method for detecting radar obstruction Grant 6,469,659 - Lajiness , et al. October 22, 2 | 2002-10-22 |
| Discrimination of detected objects in a vehicle path Grant 6,404,328 - Alland , et al. June 11, 2 | 2002-06-11 |
| Automatic curve sensor calibration method for an automotive CW/ICC system Grant 6,202,027 - Alland , et al. March 13, 2 | 2001-03-13 |
| Angle extent estimation method for a motor vehicle object detection system Grant 6,002,983 - Alland , et al. December 14, 1 | 1999-12-14 |
| Automatic sensor azimuth alignment Grant 5,964,822 - Alland , et al. October 12, 1 | 1999-10-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 