loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Seagar; Neville David.The latest application filed is for "laundry machine with lost motion clutch".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Linear compressor Grant 9,605,666 - Seagar , et al. March 28, 2 | 2017-03-28 |
Laundry Machine With Lost Motion Clutch App 20090145173 - Seagar; Neville David ;   et al. | 2009-06-11 |
Method of manufacturing a linear compressor Grant 7,185,431 - Seagar , et al. March 6, 2 | 2007-03-06 |
Linear compressor App 20060171822 - Seagar; Neville David ;   et al. | 2006-08-03 |
Perforation of laundry machine drum Grant 6,776,015 - Seagar , et al. August 17, 2 | 2004-08-17 |
Top loading washing machine Grant 6,578,391 - Seagar , et al. June 17, 2 | 2003-06-17 |
Top loading washing machine Grant 6,481,035 - Seagar , et al. November 19, 2 | 2002-11-19 |
Top loading washing machine App 20020040506 - Seagar, Neville David ;   et al. | 2002-04-11 |
Top loading laundry appliance Grant 6,363,756 - Seagar , et al. April 2, 2 | 2002-04-02 |
Perforation of laundry machine drum App 20020023467 - Seagar, Neville David ;   et al. | 2002-02-28 |
Top loading washing machine App 20020014095 - Seagar, Neville David ;   et al. | 2002-02-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.