SeaCliff Beauty Packaging & Laboratories, Inc.
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Seacliff Beauty Packaging & Laboratories, Inc.. Seacliff Beauty Packaging & Laboratories, Inc. has 5 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "JAZMINE BEAUTY"
- Company Aliases
- SeaCliff Beauty Packaging & Laboratories, Inc.
- Seacliff Beauty Packaging & Laboratories, Inc. - Irvine CA US
- SEACLIFF BEAUTY PACKAGING & LABORATORIES, INC. - Irvine CA US
| State Incorporated | CALIFORNIA |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | 9810 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 92618 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Airtight Compact 20190116957 - 16/200768 Montoli; Antonio | 2019-04-25 |
| Airtight Compact 20160220007 - 15/021063 Montoli; Antonio | 2016-08-04 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"JAZMINE BEAUTY" 88285546 |
JAZMINE BEAUTY 2019-02-01 |
"BEAUTILOCK" 87901966 |
BEAUTILOCK 2018-05-01 |
"BEAUTILOCK" 86245210 |
BEAUTILOCK 2014-04-07 |
"LIP CHILLERS" 85920848 |
LIP CHILLERS 2013-05-01 |
"MINI KITTOUR" 3857955 77779973 |
MINI KITTOUR 2009-07-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 