Scott; Thomas W.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Scott; Thomas W..The latest application filed is for "nacelle for a high bypass ratio engine with multiple flow paths".
- Scott; Thomas W. - San Diego CA
- Scott; Thomas W. - Columbia SC
- Scott; Thomas W. - Lafayette LA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Nacelle for a high bypass ratio engine with multiple flow paths Grant 9,623,976 - James , et al. April 18, 2 | 2017-04-18 |
| Nacelle For A High Bypass Ratio Engine With Multiple Flow Paths App 20140271169 - James; Norman J. ; et al. | 2014-09-18 |
| Circuit tracer transmitter Grant D556,067 - Fugman , et al. November 27, 2 | 2007-11-27 |
| Circuit tracer receiver Grant D556,068 - Fugman , et al. November 27, 2 | 2007-11-27 |
| Thread cleaner with rotatable and adjustably supported brushes Grant 4,014,062 - Scott , et al. March 29, 1 | 1977-03-29 |
| Cleaner for tubular pin and box ends Grant 4,011,617 - Toelke , et al. March 15, 1 | 1977-03-15 |
| NCAGE Code | 4XLL7 | SCOTT, THOMAS W |
| CAGE Code | 4XLL7 | SCOTT, THOMAS W |
| DUNS | 808473263 | SCOTT, THOMAS W |
| SEC | 0001367189 | Scott Thomas W |
| SEC | 0001198535 | SCOTT THOMAS W |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 