loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Scott; Phillip Ray.The latest application filed is for "high pressure foliage remover".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
High pressure foliage remover Grant 7,293,399 - Scott November 13, 2 | 2007-11-13 |
High pressure foliage remover App 20070033914 - Scott; Phillip Ray | 2007-02-15 |
Self adjusting vertical shaker Grant 6,857,258 - Scott February 22, 2 | 2005-02-22 |
Self Adjusting Vertical Shaker App 20050000204 - Scott, Phillip Ray | 2005-01-06 |
Multiple saw pruning apparatus Grant 6,698,176 - Scott March 2, 2 | 2004-03-02 |
Bulk material trailer Grant 6,624,363 - Orlando , et al. September 23, 2 | 2003-09-23 |
Multiple saw pruning apparatus App 20030126849 - Scott, Phillip Ray | 2003-07-10 |
Bulk material trailer App 20030024746 - Orlando, Franklin P. ;   et al. | 2003-02-06 |
Crop harvesting rod array Grant 6,003,294 - Fitzgerald , et al. December 21, 1 | 1999-12-21 |
Tree borne fruit harvester Grant 5,904,034 - Youman , et al. May 18, 1 | 1999-05-18 |
Citrus harvester Grant 5,661,963 - Scott September 2, 1 | 1997-09-02 |
Elastomer closure spring Grant 5,647,194 - Scott , et al. July 15, 1 | 1997-07-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.