loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Schwartz; Hermann.The latest application filed is for "article for simulation of smoking".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Article for simulation of smoking Grant 5,101,838 - Schwartz , et al. April 7, 1 | 1992-04-07 |
Portable data carrying device Grant 4,985,921 - Schwartz Ja | 1991-01-15 |
Method and apparatus to obtain an electrical signal representative of thickness of a traveling filament Grant 4,091,368 - Schwartz May 23, 1 | 1978-05-23 |
Method and apparatus to monitor thread spinning operation of open end spinning machines and effective thread stop motion Grant 4,060,965 - Schwartz December 6, 1 | 1977-12-06 |
Electro-mechanical thread supervisory apparatus Grant 3,938,119 - Schwartz February 10, 1 | 1976-02-10 |
Releasable paper clip Grant 3,898,717 - Schwartz August 12, 1 | 1975-08-12 |
Method and apparatus for spot checking a checkout cashier operation in a store Grant 3,878,365 - Schwartz April 15, 1 | 1975-04-15 |
Bank Note Testing Apparatus Grant 3,725,667 - Schwartz April 3, 1 | 1973-04-03 |
Yarn Defect Detector Apparatus For Textile Machinery Grant 3,673,591 - Schwartz June 27, 1 | 1972-06-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.