Trademark applications and grants for Schwartz Barbara. Schwartz Barbara has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "HEADSHOTS COLUMBUS LOOKIN' GOOD! QUICK, WONDERFUL, BUSINESS PORTRAITS PHOTOGRAPHY FOR PROFESSIONALS"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Mesh for pelvic floor repair 20030114866 - 10/263933 Ulmsten, Ulf ;   et al. | 2003-06-19 |
Wedge shoe base D741,585 - D/468,996 Schwartz , et al. October 27, 2 | 2015-10-27 |
Wedge shoe D741,580 - D/468,993 Schwartz , et al. October 27, 2 | 2015-10-27 |
Linear polyesteramides from aminophenolic esters 9,127,124 - 14/491,102 Schwartz , et al. September 8, 2 | 2015-09-08 |
Linear polyesteramides from aminophenolic esters 8,952,106 - 13/766,136 Schwartz , et al. February 10, 2 | 2015-02-10 |
Resorbable phenolic polymers 8,927,659 - 13/867,225 Moses , et al. January 6, 2 | 2015-01-06 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "HEADSHOTS COLUMBUS LOOKIN' GOOD! QUICK, WONDERFUL, BUSINESS PORTRAITS PHOTOGRAPHY FOR PROFESSIONALS" 5072154 86926594 |
HEADSHOTS COLUMBUS LOOKIN' GOOD! QUICK, WONDERFUL, BUSINESS PORTRAITS PHOTOGRAPHY FOR PROFESSIONALS 2016-03-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.