Schwank; Johannes
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Schwank; Johannes.The latest application filed is for "recovery of adsorption capacity of beaded activated carbon using gas-phase organic solvents".
- Schwank; Johannes - Ann Arbor MI
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Recovery of adsorption capacity of beaded activated carbon using gas-phase organic solvents Grant 11,369,946 - Ohtani , et al. June 28, 2 | 2022-06-28 |
| Recovery Of Adsorption Capacity Of Beaded Activated Carbon Using Gas-phase Organic Solvents App 20200086298 - Ohtani; Hiroko ; et al. | 2020-03-19 |
| Catalytic reforming methods Grant 8,440,107 - Tadd , et al. May 14, 2 | 2013-05-14 |
| Catalytic Reforming Methods App 20110121239 - Tadd; Andrew R. ; et al. | 2011-05-26 |
| Use of microwave energy to remove contaminating deposits from a catalyst App 20110118105 - Schwank; Johannes ; et al. | 2011-05-19 |
| Modified molybdenum sulfide hydrodesulfurization/hydrodenitrogenation catalysts Grant 5,010,049 - Villa-Garcia , et al. April 23, 1 | 1991-04-23 |
| Ultrathin-film gas detector Grant 4,953,387 - Johnson , et al. September 4, 1 | 1990-09-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 