loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Schoephoerster; Richard T..The latest application filed is for "catheter deliverable artificial multi-leaflet heart valve prosthesis and intravascular delivery system for a catheter deliverable heart valve prosthesis".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Catheter Deliverable Artificial Multi-leaflet Heart Valve Prosthesis And Intravascular Delivery System For A Catheter Deliverable Heart Valve Prosthesis App 20150134056 - Claiborne, III; Thomas Edward ;   et al. | 2015-05-14 |
Catheter deliverable artificial multi-leaflet heart valve prosthesis and intravascular delivery system for a catheter deliverable heart valve prosthesis Grant 9,011,525 - Claiborne, III , et al. April 21, 2 | 2015-04-21 |
Catheter Deliverable Artificial Multi-Leaflet Heart Valve Prosthesis and Intravascular Delivery System for a Catheter Deliverable Heart Valve Prosthesis App 20110295361 - Claiborne, III; Thomas E. ;   et al. | 2011-12-01 |
Collapsible Heart Valve with Polymer Leaflets App 20090112309 - Jaramillo; Fernando ;   et al. | 2009-04-30 |
NCAGE Code | 4GFT1 | SCHOEPHOERSTER RICHARD T |
CAGE Code | 4GFT1 | SCHOEPHOERSTER, RICHARD T |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.