loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Schmidt; Stephen L..The latest application filed is for "ribulose, 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase polypeptides and related polynucleotides".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Ribulose, 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase polypeptides and related polynucleotides Grant 7,745,186 - Chatterjee , et al. June 29, 2 | 2010-06-29 |
Ribulose, 1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase/oxygenase Polypeptides And Related Polynucleotides App 20090162895 - CHATTERJEE; Ranjini ;   et al. | 2009-06-25 |
Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase polypeptides and related polynucleotides Grant 7,351,562 - Chatterjee , et al. April 1, 2 | 2008-04-01 |
Method and a system for maintaining an acceptable level of relative humidity inside of a disk drive Grant 7,298,571 - Schmidt , et al. November 20, 2 | 2007-11-20 |
Method And A System For Maintaining An Acceptable Level Of Relative Humidity Inside Of A Disk Drive App 20070253086 - Schmidt; Stephen L. ;   et al. | 2007-11-01 |
Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase polypeptides and related polynucleotides App 20040038262 - Chatterjee, Ranjini ;   et al. | 2004-02-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.