Schiller Medical S.A.S.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Schiller Medical S.A.S..The latest application filed is for "method, apparatus and computer program for defibrillation delivery decision".
- Schiller Medical S.A.S. - Wissembourg FR
- SCHILLER MEDICAL S.A.S. - Wissembourg Cedex FR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Device and method for cooling a patient Grant 9,622,908 - Fontaine April 18, 2 | 2017-04-18 |
| Method, apparatus and computer program for defibrillation delivery decision Grant 9,308,383 - Didon April 12, 2 | 2016-04-12 |
| Defibrillator, rescue kit of parts and process for controlling the quality of chest compression Grant 9,265,963 - Didon February 23, 2 | 2016-02-23 |
| Method, Apparatus and Computer Program for Defibrillation Delivery Decision App 20110224746 - Didon; Jean-Philippe | 2011-09-15 |
| Defibrillator Having a Secure Discharging Circuit Comprising an H-Bridge App 20110106190 - Foeller; Clement ; et al. | 2011-05-05 |
| Defibrillator, Rescue Kit of Parts and Process for Controlling the Quality of Chest Compression App 20100234908 - Didon; Jean-Philippe | 2010-09-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 