loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Schieck; Richard A..The latest application filed is for "method for generating a rating for assessing accessibility standards compliance".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Method for generating a rating for assessing accessibility standards compliance Grant 7,280,976 - Litwiller , et al. October 9, 2 | 2007-10-09 |
Method for generating a rating for assessing accessibility standards compliance App 20030187724 - Litwiller, Debora Margaret Hejza ;   et al. | 2003-10-02 |
Vacuum transport apparatus Grant 5,548,388 - Schieck August 20, 1 | 1996-08-20 |
Method and means for correcting lateral registration errors Grant 5,442,388 - Schieck August 15, 1 | 1995-08-15 |
Tilting tray for feeding and stacking specialized forms Grant 5,364,087 - Schieck , et al. November 15, 1 | 1994-11-15 |
Copy sheet skew adjustment device Grant 4,994,864 - Schieck , et al. February 19, 1 | 1991-02-19 |
Document handling device Grant H21 - Schieck February 4, 1 | 1986-02-04 |
Plural mode copy sheet output slitter Grant 4,559,855 - Schieck December 24, 1 | 1985-12-24 |
Dual mode catch tray Grant 4,191,467 - Schieck March 4, 1 | 1980-03-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.