Trademark applications and grants for Schering Plough Corp. Schering Plough Corp has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "NON-ACNEGENIC NON COMEDOGENIC WON'T CLOG PORES"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
PROCESS FOR THE SYNTHESIS OF AZETIDINONES 20120083601 - 13/323366 THIRUVENGADAM; TIRUVETTIPURAM K. ;   et al. | 2012-04-05 |
Bicyclic Heterocyclic Derivatives and Methods of Use Thereof 20110319434 - 13/139656 Palani; Anandan ;   et al. | 2011-12-29 |
PIPERIDINE AND PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF 20110245267 - 13/139639 Xiao; Dong ;   et al. | 2011-10-06 |
ANTIFUNGAL COMPOSITION WITH ENHANCED BIOAVAILABILITY 20110244004 - 13/161097 Sharpe; Stefan ;   et al. | 2011-10-06 |
Functionally Selective Alpha2C Adrenoreceptor Agonists 20110060006 - 12/918427 Zheng; Junying ;   et al. | 2011-03-10 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
"NON-ACNEGENIC NON COMEDOGENIC WON'T CLOG PORES" 73839505 |
NON-ACNEGENIC NON COMEDOGENIC WON'T CLOG PORES 1989-11-15 |
"SP" 1176757 73152116 |
SP 1977-12-15 |
"SP" 1108365 73124670 |
SP 1977-04-28 |
NCAGE Code | 1F095 | SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION |
CAGE Code | 1F095 | SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.