Scheele; Patrick
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Scheele; Patrick.The latest application filed is for "circuit for impedance matching".
- Scheele; Patrick - Ulm DE
- Scheele; Patrick - Munchen DE
- Scheele; Patrick - Darmstadt DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Circuit for impedance matching Grant 8,400,233 - Scheele , et al. March 19, 2 | 2013-03-19 |
| Circuit for Impedance Matching App 20130005288 - Scheele; Patrick ; et al. | 2013-01-03 |
| Circuit for Impedance Matching App 20110090021 - Scheele; Patrick ; et al. | 2011-04-21 |
| Ceramic dielectric or thin and/or thick layers containing at least one ceramic dielectric method for production and use thereof Grant 7,910,510 - Paul , et al. March 22, 2 | 2011-03-22 |
| Ceramic Dielectric Or Thin And/or Thick Layers Containing At Least One Ceramic Dielectric Method For Production And Use Thereof App 20090297804 - Paul; Florian ; et al. | 2009-12-03 |
| Components for high-frequency technology Grant 7,361,288 - Lussem , et al. April 22, 2 | 2008-04-22 |
| Components for high-frequency technology App 20050067605 - Lussem, Georg ; et al. | 2005-03-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 