ScanMed, LLC
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for ScanMed, LLC.The latest application filed is for "dual frequency coil package for magnetic resonance imaging system upgrade".
- ScanMed, LLC - Omaha NE
Trademarks
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Wearable MRI pelvic coil Grant D963,168 - Jones September 6, 2 | 2022-09-06 |
| Dual Frequency Coil Package for Magnetic Resonance Imaging System Upgrade App 20220214412 - Jones; Randall W. | 2022-07-07 |
| Mononuclear MRI upgrade system and method Grant 11,333,725 - Jones May 17, 2 | 2022-05-17 |
| Garment MRI antenna array Grant 11,039,787 - Jones June 22, 2 | 2021-06-22 |
| Pelvic MRI coil Grant D911,526 - Jones February 23, 2 | 2021-02-23 |
| Dual tuned MRI resonator and coil package and method Grant 10,761,159 - Jones Sep | 2020-09-01 |
| Garment Mri Antenna Array App 20180263561 - JONES; RANDALL W. | 2018-09-20 |
| Dual Tuned Mri Resonator And Coil Package And Method App 20180252783 - Jones; Randall W. | 2018-09-06 |
| Garment Mri Antenna Array App 20150173678 - JONES; RANDALL W. | 2015-06-25 |
| Garment MRI antenna array Grant 9,002,431 - Jones April 7, 2 | 2015-04-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 