Santulli; Scott
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Santulli; Scott.The latest application filed is for "card reader for receiving a card bearing an imprinted data strip, self positioning the card in a pre-determined position and scanning the imprinted data strip in two directions".
- Santulli; Scott - Danbury CT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Card reader for receiving a card bearing an imprinted data strip, self positioning the card in a pre-determined position and scanning the imprinted data strip in two directions Grant 4,886,957 - Glaberson , et al. December 12, 1 | 1989-12-12 |
| Printed data strip including bit-encoded information and scanner control Grant 4,782,221 - Brass , et al. November 1, 1 | 1988-11-01 |
| Method and apparatus for transforming digitally encoded data into printed data strips Grant 4,754,127 - Brass , et al. June 28, 1 | 1988-06-28 |
| Method and apparatus for transforming digitally encoded data into printed data strips Grant 4,728,783 - Brass , et al. March 1, 1 | 1988-03-01 |
| Optical reader for printed bit-encoded data and method of reading same Grant 4,692,603 - Brass , et al. September 8, 1 | 1987-09-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 