loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Sandhaus; Jeffrey.The latest application filed is for "apparatus for effecting occlusion of the vas deferens".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Apparatus for effecting occlusion of the vas deferens Grant 4,877,028 - Sandhaus October 31, 1 | 1989-10-31 |
Safety device for hypodermic needles Grant 4,747,835 - Sandhaus May 31, 1 | 1988-05-31 |
Closure having integral formed sealing means Grant 4,640,429 - Sandhaus February 3, 1 | 1987-02-03 |
Tamper-evident closure apparatus Grant 4,591,062 - Sandhaus May 27, 1 | 1986-05-27 |
Plastic linerless closure Grant 4,574,966 - Sandhaus March 11, 1 | 1986-03-11 |
Closure Grant 4,535,905 - Sandhaus August 20, 1 | 1985-08-20 |
Tamper resistant safety closure and closure-container combination Grant 4,479,585 - Sandhaus October 30, 1 | 1984-10-30 |
Unitary screw-type safety closure and closure-container combination Grant 4,442,945 - Sandhaus April 17, 1 | 1984-04-17 |
Child-resistant closure member Grant 4,413,742 - Sandhaus November 8, 1 | 1983-11-08 |
Apparatus and method for effecting occlusion of the vas deferens Grant 4,394,864 - Sandhaus July 26, 1 | 1983-07-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.