Trademark applications and grants for Sanderson, William D.. Sanderson, William D. has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PHOTOCHLOR"
Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
Address | No. 101, 3053 Fillmore Street San Francisco, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 94123 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
BIOCIDE COMPOSITIONS 20090232903 - 12/472649 Sanderson; William D. | 2009-09-17 |
STABLE CHLORINE DIOXIDE TABLET 20090185970 - 12/015962 Sanderson; William D. | 2009-07-23 |
Solid Biocide Composition and Sealed Biocide Article 20080299161 - 12/091785 Sanderson; William D. | 2008-12-04 |
Dispersal air scrubber 20060115388 - 10/537739 Sanderson; William D. | 2006-06-01 |
Apparatus and method for producing chlorine dioxide 20050079124 - 11/002647 Sanderson, William D. | 2005-04-14 |
Apparatus and method for producing chlorine dioxide 7,695,692 - 11/002,647 Sanderson April 13, 2 | 2010-04-13 |
Stable chlorine dioxide tablet 7,666,384 - 12/015,962 Sanderson February 23, 2 | 2010-02-23 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "PHOTOCHLOR" 76577968 |
PHOTOCHLOR 2004-02-26 |
![]() "NANOFOAM" 78168017 |
NANOFOAM 2002-09-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.